SHOW-CAUSE NOTICES NOS.18 AND 19 OF 2010 ISSUES TO MESSRS ACE GROUP OF INDUSTRIES versus
Sections 10, 30, 37 and 38 of the Competition Commission (General Enforcement) Regulations, 2007, Regine 17 had alleged the complainant against counterfeit marketing practices that a group of industries used to sell, sell, export leather jackets. And it was fraudulent and without permission. Using complaints made by trademark registered trademark on its product and the use of such complainant / trademark was fake, it was good ideology and it compiled the practices of \ fraudulent marketing methods, which Was banned under Section 10 of the Ordinance, 2010. , The Competition Commission appoints inquiry officers and, after analyzing and investigating complaints, commences an inquiry under Section 37 of the Competitive Commission 2010, concluding the inquiry and in its report The accused company's conduct and conduct were shown to be innocent and unaware of the special law / competition on the Ordinance, 2010, but the law could not have been known to the Inquiry Officers, in the circumstances it was found that the company had taken into account the recommendations of the inquiry officers. In contravention of the provisions of Section 10 (1) (a) (d) of the Competition Ordinance, 2010. Decided to take action under Section 30 of the Competitive Ordinance, 2010 and issued a show cause notice to the company, the company representative apologized and insisted that he was aware of the existence of such law and ignorance Violates the ordinance by promoting goods containing Admission to the complaining company, at the first inquiry stage and consequently in accordance with this ordinance
