J.M. ENTERPRISES THROUGH MESSRS TAX & MANAGEMENT CONSULTANT, KARACHI versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Offices 7, 8 and 10 of the Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (XXXV of 2000V), Complainant adjusting Sections 9, 10 and 11 Sales Tax Input, requested that the Directorate of Revenue Receipt Audit, in respect of Sales Tax, Preview. The input adjustment, based on photocopies of 5 bills of entry, was not well established. There was no satisfactory response from the complainant's department representative that he approached the relevant assistant collector and filed the entry. After submitting the original bill, the Assistant Collector then assured that he would satisfy the Directorate of Revenue Inquiry Audit or his office so that the matter could be resolved by a department representative confirming that the sales tax payment was appropriate on the relevant dates. Was staged and the claim for input tax claim denied and the demand created was not correct. In the process, the complaints have been harmed by false notices since 2006. The department did not realize that the deduction of tax would have been made if the entry bills had been prepared due to the actual and payment of the portion of the portion demanded by the forced action. It had to be done and it only needed verification which was started after 3 years and that too after the issue was raised. Prior to the Federal Tax Ombudsman and after taxpayers had caused inappropriate distress and hardship, department officials should have thought about how officers claim input to determine if there was any revenue loss. The simplest way of generating demand is by rejecting. Strict measures were taken to recover even by banning the earlier decision, delayed taxpayers too much.
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2010
