Find a Lawyer

MAJOR (RETD.).JAVED ZAMIR AHMAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Section 111 The complainant claims to have received unspecified income or the sale of a property's property, which was increased without providing legal opportunity and appropriate opportunity for a hearing. Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance, 2000 Establishment of the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman, Sections 2 (3) (i) (a) and (d) and Subsections (3) (ii), Secretary, Taxes Division, Tax Officer In writing, the clarification can be made as to why they could not be prosecuted for the misconduct imposed under section 22 of the Office of the Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance 2000 and it was asked whether they were Wish to be heard in private

Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2010

• MUHAMMAD ARSHAD v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2010 PTD 132
• MAJEED & SONS STEELS (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2010 PTD 783
• ZAMAN TEXTILE MILLS LTD. v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2010 PTD 862
• ZIA INDUSTRY, GUJRANWALA v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2010 PTD 913
• BILAL HUSSAIN v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2010 PTD 1001
• AMIN AND SONS TAILOR, MIANWALI v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2010 PTD 21
• J.M. ENTERPRISES through Messrs Tax & Management Consultant, Karachi v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2010 PTD 53
• T.F. PIPES LTD., ISLAMABAD v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2010 PTD 124

All Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan judgments of 2010 →

best advocate from Naukundi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes