Find a Lawyer

T.F. PIPES LTD., ISLAMABAD versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD

Article 25 Establishment of Office of Federal Tax Ombudsman Ordinance (2000 X 2000), Sections 2 (3), 9, 10 and 11 Customs Demanding Customs Duty and Small Amount of Import Value Added Import Complaint was lodged against the customs duty and tax on the continued failure to provide reasonable proof of the high cost of customs without providing proof of high value without disrupting the legitimate value of its goods imports. Refund Claims Received Forced Receipt By Customs Authorities Delaying Complainant Compliance , A complaint was filed customs authorities that the complainant was forced to lower demand for customs duties and taxes imposed on the company he was forcibly recovered by threatening to shut down the operations of the Bonded Warehouses. Extra money plus customs authorities to protect their direct file containing case documents from harm and misleading because direct file protection containing damages or misleading litigation documents is a high responsibility of each department. The loss or misrule has increased to such an extent and the mismanagement involved in the seriousness of the case involves pre-audit of refund claims on the return of the amount on which the audit paradigm was resolved. And thus the decision to provide illegal and irresponsible refund was timely. It was said that disciplinary action should be taken under the Termination Ordinance 2000 of the Service (Special Powers): Customs Officers / Officers, who initially obtained valuable advice regarding the value of imported trade.

Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2010

• Major (Retd.).JAVED ZAMIR AHMAD v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2010 PTD 954
• BILAL HUSSAIN v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2010 PTD 1001
• AMIN AND SONS TAILOR, MIANWALI v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2010 PTD 21
• J.M. ENTERPRISES through Messrs Tax & Management Consultant, Karachi v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2010 PTD 53
• MUHAMMAD ARSHAD v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2010 PTD 132
• MAJEED & SONS STEELS (PVT.) LTD., KARACHI v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, GOVERNMENT OF PAKISTAN, ISLAMABAD 2010 PTD 783
• ZAMAN TEXTILE MILLS LTD. v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2010 PTD 862
• ZIA INDUSTRY, GUJRANWALA v. SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD 2010 PTD 913

All Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan judgments of 2010 →

top advocates from Chacklala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes