BILAL HUSSAIN versus SECRETARY, REVENUE DIVISION, ISLAMABAD
Section 156 Criminal Sentence CBR Policy No. (1) AS 04 Dated 24 3 2006 Complaint for cancellation of tampering vehicle bid and refund of bid amount Accuracy record shows that in compliance with customs authorities The vehicle encountered problems initially caused by the failure. The Central Board of Revenue sought to sell, confiscate vehicles only to public / non-governmental entities, causing problems for both parties to cause, exacerbate and complicate the complainant's apparent irregularities. Responsibility shared. The required course of the case would be that the customs authorities withdrew the trespassing vehicle only to the government / semi-government departments / agencies etc as per the guidelines provided by the Central Board of Revenue Examples available in federal tax. The return of the vehicle was also applied after the ombudsman's decision and the complainant's request had been added after the customs authorities had finally confirmed the receipts, adding to the amount of repair repaired. Depression can be processed because of its retention and use. The Federal Tax Ombudsman imports second-hand vehicles and assesses import taxes and tax imports. According to its rules, we recommend that the seized / tampered vehicle be withdrawn by the Department of Customs. After confirming receipts for repairs and renovations, the complainant must pay the sales price and repair and renovation charges. And lowering the price according to the rules; that the time limit for registration of vehicles purchased at the custom auction will be met.
Related judgments — Federal Tax Ombudsman Pakistan, 2010
