Article 199 (1) (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), the detention of constitutional jurisdiction under section 199 (1) (c) of the Constitution of the juvenile, with any person, No need to work. Federation or provincial or local authority affairs, the use of the word (including those in CL (C)), not enumerated in CL (A) or (B) of Article 19 cl, to enforce fundamental rights The most important authority of the High Court was (therefore, in favor of the life of Certiorari, Mandamus, Prohibition, QuoVerento and the Habeas Corpus, not only one's own life, but also one's life, liberty and happiness). To deny a child's right to the companionship of his children by denying his life was equally a heinous crime and a curse, that the strong bond that nature created was a bond between mother and child, and it was not the only restriction. E-period when the baby lives inside the mother's body, but still continues, after all, the baby's first meal comes from the mother's body, therefore, if a mother has the right to live with her baby. Has been denied. , This would be a violation of the fundamental right to her life, so under Article 491, CRPC as well as Article 199 (1) (c) of the Constitution, the child was already with the mother whose The custody petition was filed by her father under the Guardians and Wards Act, 1890, the mother had the right to have her young child, who was only three years old, be more suitable for bringing both children together. Was detained, resulting in the custody of the juvenile at the end of the Family Court after the appropriate hearing according to the constitutional petition.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
