Section 1 561A Panel Code (XLV of 60 1860 of), Sections 202020, 6 406, 9489F and 34 ating a check for fraud, criminal breach of trust and dishonesty in Class C Issuing their application challenged the order challenging the judicial magistrate applicants' request. The Judicial Magistrate passed the order under which the Investigation Officer's report submitted for disposal at C class disposal was not accepted and directed the investigating officer to furnish challan in court. Was. Applicant's lawyer's position was maintained that there was no crime in the FIR against the applicants. And that in fact the dispute was between the complainant and one other person and the applicants had nothing to do with the same authenticity. There was some dispute between the parties over some payments between the complainant and the other person said and some exchanges said. The second person with the complainant, who was later humiliated by the dispute, when the complainant was returning from the mosque, pleaded with the applicant that the other person also threatened her with dire consequences. They demanded money. It has been stated that the prosecution witnesses witnessed the statements of the prosecution witnesses as well as the contents of the complainant were fully supported and confirmed by the contents of the FIR. And when the report was presented to the magistrate under `C Classunder ', he was not satisfied that the evidence collected by the Investigation Officer for legal proceedings against the applicants had been submitted by the Inquiry Officer. Ray
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
