UNITED BANK LIMITED THROUGH POWER OF ATTORNEY versus SINDH LABOUR COURT NO.5, KARACHI
Section O 15 of the Industrial Relations Act (IV of 2008), Articles 41 and 55 of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 of the Constitution Petition for Disposal of Indemnity Services Employee's Services to Issue Shock Notice to Bank Was terminated after an investigation against. Employees were allowed to request a complaint of mismanagement filed against him, and he was ordered that the employer be free to punish the employee according to the circumstances. According to the Labor Appellate Tribunal, as it was not formulated in Sindh province under the law under section 55 of the Industrial Relations Act, 2008, the employer filed a constitutional petition against the Labor Court's decision to charge five Received money on different occasions, but did not account for the running of the same bank in the same system, which was a hard document and a document under one banking system, at the end of each day, if more cash was available. But if the cash was low, then the employee had to explain at the end of the day, in the present case There was no statement of the employee that when he collected the book, he found that the employee had received the cash, but he did not take account of it. It was not the fault of all the bank / employer which the Labor Court stated. Was. By order that the punishment was declared a felony. It involved the employer's decision to decide which punishment the employee should be punished for, if there was financial misconduct or misconduct, no matter how small. There may be money and whatever the short term of the disappointment may be, employees will not be entitled to any kind of relaxation.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
