Section 12 Contract Act (IX of 1872), section 55 suit for the specific performance of the contract, considering the total sale in the case of sale, was Rs. 53, 50,000 and Rs. 500,000, the plaintiff signed the contract. At the time the defendant was paid 1995 48, 1995,000, Rs, 000 rupees will be considered or before 1995 1995 1995 Pen 1995 penalty results were provided in terms of agreement against the default party at the time. The essence of the agreement was that the plaintiff / seller did not offer to pay the balance order and the defendant / seller considered the plaintiff by depositing the balance amount in court by trying to deposit the money. I could ask for the recipe. After more than a decade has passed, it will be extremely inadequate to order specific performance at that time. It would be fair and equitable for a contract when the property price to increase significantly in the recent past and to instruct the defendant to refund Edo. At the time of the contract, the accused was instructed to return the balance amount of Rs. 5,00,000 with a total sum of Rs. 10,000,000 on or before the due date by the pay order / demand draft.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
