Sections 12, 22 and 25 (a) of the Civil Procedure Code (v. 1908), section 151 suit for specific performance of a sales contract, the execution of the contract, and the unregistered general power of attorney in favor of the plaintiff, who sell the whole to the defendant It is in favor of the claimant to pay consideration. Claiming to own the suit land on the basis of the sale agreement and the unregistered General Power of Attorney executed by its original owner, Palia, that the sale agreement and the unregistered General Power of Attorney have alleged that the defendant Was executed in favor of Ali. Documents that he held the mortgage with the plaintiff after the original documents were submitted to the bank before the date of the plaintiff's and defendant's documents, although he was not required by the court, nor did he file the suit. The original documents of the land were not presented nor any plausible explanation so the legal documents were in the possession of the land by the bank because of the security of the loan obtained by the original owner. The original title documents were looked at by the court and returned to the bank and not promoted under the law Was the authority to execute the contract or the Attorney General in favor of the General Power Plaintiff Cell Agreement and the General Power of Attorney alleging that the original owner had executed in favor of the plaintiff, the former forged documents were section 22 and the Special Relief Act 1877 The provisions, expressly barred the plaintiff from seeking such relief. Excluded from the use of your inherited jurisdiction
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
