SYED AGHA ZIA-UL-USMAN ALI SHAH versus BOARD OF TRUSTEE OF KARACHI PORT TRUST THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Whether the appeal of section 2 (1) (b) service tribunals act (LXX of 1973), section 2A & 4 constitution of Pakistan (1973), arts 199 and 212 constitutional petition, was the end of the question raised in the case. Whether its appeals or appeals were made automatically (without formal orders) or whether the Service Tribunal Supreme Court required a court order under PLD 2006 SC 602 in its court decision, the Service Tribunals Act Employees' cases were registered under Section 2A of 1973. The Serv does not fall under the definition of a civil servant, as described in section 2 (1) (b) of the Civil Servants Act, 1973, which has no remedy before the Service Tribunal operating under Article 1212 of the Constitution. And they can remain free. Get Reasonable Remedies After the Supreme Court decision, some appeals before the service tribunal were rejected and in some of those appeals, the registrar of the tribunal ordered a stay which was challenged before the Supreme Court. In 2008, SCMR 402 stated that after providing the opportunity to the parties, a separate order must be issued by the service tribunal in each case. Following the Supreme Court order, the service tribunal began to pass a court order with the signature of the presiding officer. The Tribunal was given 30 days to allow the applicants time to approach the service tribunal to apply for a court order on their appeals before the relevant Bench to decide the matters to be decided. Go \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
