Find a Lawyer

SONERI BANK LTD. versus DEWAN SUGAR MILLS LTD.

Sections 9 and 15 apply for sale of mortgaged goods suit for the plaintiff / bank Applicant to the plaintiff seeking order for the sale of sugar promised by the plaintiff to the plaintiff for the sale of sugar promised by the plaintiff bank. The defendant, with such a sale procedure, shall present to the public official that he can obtain from the market for the sale of the stock or part thereof, after the confirmation of such offer. The assistant must be fair and the order to issue a reasonable and delivery order will be fixed later on submitting the price submitted with the High Court vows. The defendant will start practicing soon so that all the stock can be sold in a period of three months. There is also the freedom to submit and submit a purchase offer

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND FEDERAL EXCISE (RTO) v. ZEAL PAK CEMENT FACTORY, HYDERABAD 2010 PTD 147
• MUHAMMAD AYOOB v. Dr. IMTIAZ HASHMI 2010 PCrLJ 147
• NAVEENA EXPORTS LTD. v. DIRECTORATE OF LABOUR, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH EAST DIVISION 2010 PLC 148
• NAZIMUDDIN AHMED v. AINUDDIN AHMED 2010 PLD 148
• NAYAR AHMED MAZHARI v. BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE EDUCATION through Chief Executive 2010 PLC(CS) 151
• Javed Iqbal Ghaznavi 2010 PLD 153
• RAFIQUE USMAN v. AXACT CYBER SOLUTIONS through Proprietor 2010 YLR 155
• Syed Agha ZIA-UL-USMAN ALI SHAH v. BOARD OF TRUSTEE OF KARACHI PORT TRUST through Chairman 2010 PLC(CS) 158

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocate from Sohawa District Jelum lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes