GHULAM MUSTAFA KHAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY
Article 199 Constitution Petition In the early stages of double jeopardy, the principle of applicant was restored by the service tribunal, and the decision was upheld by the Supreme Court but authorities were allowed to initiate a new inquiry. Can go After the previous allegations and grounds, the applicant was once again dismissed from service. On the basis of the same allegations and grounds, proceedings against the applicant were not granted to the authority, which could not be proved before the service tribunal and was declared inadequate ground for award. Such a fact was never disputed, nor was it reversed, nor was it set aside by the Supreme Court authorities. The same charge could not be allowed to cover the legal errors existing in the past, with a pre-determined mind set to punish the applicant on the same set. Second, the period of action against the applicant The period of action that was scheduled for the entire action by the authorities, was based on economic utility and could not be sustained in the High Court under the constitutional jurisdiction, Was announced as a retraction of his employment dismissal order. Legal Outcome The High Court instructed officials to reinstate the applicant into their service with a return to employment.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
