Sections 619 (c) Criminal Code of Conduct (v. 1898), Sections 2121, 222, 342 and 537 charged with the definition of evidence of intoxicating substance were heavy quantities of heroin for which only two convictions were given in law, Namely death or imprisonment. For life and the trial court had taken a gentle approach to sentencing him to life imprisonment, he had to be very careful in accusing him in such cases, which was the summary of the prosecution's story and the judge had to see the counsel. Recovery and arrest; FIR and challan; and thereafter, he had to make the charge by writing down the brief facts of the case, as far as stated under section 342, CC PACI was concerned, the prosecution witnesses Whatever evidence the record provided against the accused had to be put through the first questionnaire. Neither he nor the trial judge had seen the recovery and challan memorandum before the indictment, nor did he pass the evidence recorded by the prosecution's witnesses before making statements under section 342, CCPCED illegally. Could not be treated under Section 3737, CRPC. The best case was that the trial was to be remanded in the trial court from the point of charge. The verdict was set aside and after the trial, it was remanded for a new decision. \ r \ n \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
