MASROOR HUSSAIN versus CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES
Sections 2 (a) and 3 of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application by the International Airline Corporation of Pakistan (PIAC), Martial Law Regulation No. 52, in 1982 without assigning employees without cause, the year 1990 Instead of reinstating applicants into service on the Appointment Reappointment Review Board's recommendations, the PIAC recruited 250 other applicants in the Employee Rehabilitation Ordinance, 2009 under the provisions contained in the 2009 Act. , With full funding from PIAC, wishing for the same recovery relief. The dismissal of the 250 Employees Accreditation Employees (Rehabilitation) Ordinance, 2009 applies to only one corporation employee, who was recruited from November 1993 to November 1996, and removed from November 1996 to December 1998. , The benefit of the ordinance could not be granted. A corporation employee did not meet both of these conditions. Applicants were removed from the survey in 1982 and again in 1990, but were dismissed by employees ( Rehabilitation) was not fired at the time of issuance of the Ordinance, 2009, PIAC had no legal code, HK Wert was excluded for failing to uphold a constitutional request.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
