Find a Lawyer

NIB BANK LIMITED versus TAHA SPINNING MILLS LIMITED

Sections 9 and 10 (3) (4) suit for recovery of loan amount Section 10 (3) (4) of the financial institutions concerned with the use of finance facilities by the defendants and the owner of the financial obligations of the bank levy application. There is no denial of leave request for non-fulfillment of mandatory requirements (Recovery of Financial Issues) Ordinance, 2001 Defendants claim that the bank has received additional markup. The High Court has rejected the leave application and directed the parties to submit their bank statements for the defendant to decide the actual amount.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• TATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN through Divisional Head v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE 2010 CLD 628
• MASROOR HUSSAIN v. CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES 2010 PLC(CS) 630
• SHAH MURAD v. KHAIR MUHAMMAD 2010 YLR 633
• ANDAL v. State 2010 MLD 635
• Syed SHARIF HUSSAIN SHAH v. Mst. SAMINA TAUSIF 2010 CLC 637
• SHAH MURAD BROHI v. BASHIR AHMED 2010 YLR 641
• NISHAT BEGUM v. SINDH KATCHI ABADI AUTHORITY 2010 MLD 644
• NIZAMUDDIN v. State 2010 YLR 646

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

jobs for advocates from Mailsi lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes