SYED SHARIF HUSSAIN SHAH versus MST. SAMINA TAUSIF
Sections 2 (f) (i) and 15 (2) (vii) of the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application unnecessarily based on personal need The tenant's relinquishment of landlord and tenant, by the respondent Determination of the filing of the petition petitioner resisted the landlord and tenant relationship between the parties in view of personal necessity, the record shows that the respondent and his father's in-laws in this case shared Names that stand are later given to the claimant. The applicant was paying rent to the defendant's lawyer, who clearly proved that the applicant had recognized the defendant's ownership of it. In such a clear admission, the applicant should not have denied the property of the respondents where a tenant was incorporated by a person and the interests of that person were transferred to another person by title transfer. If denied, then a successor in favor of the landlord by a tenant will be entitled to the gross withdrawal from the tenant. r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
