Find a Lawyer

SHAH MURAD versus KHAIR MUHAMMAD

Section 497 (5) of the Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), the cancellation of bail in the murder of section 302/34, the request for an amended charge was settled almost 9 months after the arrest of the accused Tepedar more than a year after his arrest. Was examined after. The complainant was examined and no progress was made in the trial even after that, so the bail was granted to the accused on the basis of the labor of having been in constant custody for more than four and a half years and not on the merit. A hearing order under which the accused complainant was granted bail for failing to present a bail cancellation case, dismissing his request for bail was dismissed.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• ASSOCIATE CONSTRUCTION v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN 2010 MLD 627
• NOVARTIS PHARMA (PAKISTAN) LTD. through Corporate Pharma Compliance Officer v. IVTH JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, LARKANA 2010 PCrLJ 628
• TATE LIFE INSURANCE CORPORATION OF PAKISTAN through Divisional Head v. COLLECTOR OF SALES TAX AND CENTRAL EXCISE 2010 CLD 628
• MASROOR HUSSAIN v. CHAIRMAN, PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIRLINES 2010 PLC(CS) 630
• ANDAL v. State 2010 MLD 635
• NIB BANK LIMITED v. TAHA SPINNING MILLS LIMITED 2010 CLD 635
• Syed SHARIF HUSSAIN SHAH v. Mst. SAMINA TAUSIF 2010 CLC 637
• SHAH MURAD BROHI v. BASHIR AHMED 2010 YLR 641

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

when you need a advocate from Dadakhel lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes