ZAHID ALI LAKHO versus BOARD OF INTERMEDIATE AND SECONDARY EDUCATION, MIRPURKHAS THROUGH CHAIRMAN
Article 3 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional Application Department Action Fake Documents During the return home for the parent organization, the applicant was absorbed in the area in which the fake letter was found to be fake and fake. The letter bearing petition was rejected. On the basis of the letter on which the borrower department regulates its services, the parent department has stated that the letter was a fake letter which was not issued by the parent department, there was no document on which Can be concluded based on the consent of the parent department. The applicant in his service was obtained before the Department borrowed from the Department. The borrower acted on the basis of a letter which proved to be a fake document, hence the decision to absorb the applicant in the job was lost. , It was the only employer who could take home discipline. Action against his employee and a stranger Although he may resort to civil treatment or criminal proceedings, he cannot initiate domestic action against the person who is alleged to have been his employee. ? It was the legal responsibility of the parent department to withdraw and take action against the petitioner. It has already been issued on the basis of the showcase notice; in the disciplinary proceedings against the applicant, the parents' department should not in any way be affected by the contents of its first letter or by the department borrowing. Was excluded from proceedings under the \ r \ n
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
