Section 12 Contract Act (IX of 1872), Section 8 Transfer of Property Act (IV of 1882), Section 55 (g) suit for the specific performance of the contract to sell the refusal to execute the contract and the defendant-defendant Source suite property lease is not renewed. Whereas the cross-inspector cannot bring anything to the plaintiff's record to show that the contract was not executed by him, and the proof of his agreement on the terms contained therein, the suit for Rs. The sale of the property and receipt of Rs 1 lakh was not agreed. After receiving the part sale price of Rs 1 lakh without any reservation through check as a balance, the claimant of the accuracy will be treated as if he had received the same promise and the transfer section 55. (G) According to the agreement, the proposal was approved. The Property Act, 1882, the defendant was obliged to pass on the clear title to the record The evidence on the record shows that the defendant was left in limbo on the issue and whether the suit did not renew the lease of the plaintiff. Was ready and willing to perform its part, which for some reason the plaintiff refused or the plaintiff agreed to buy the suit property for the same residence and the construction cost would have increased substantially in the recent past. If the suit property deal was settled at the relevant time, ie about six to six years ago, the plaintiff would have to pay the construction equipment. I did not have to face the current price increase is already using the plaintiff the sum of 1 billion. To the benefit of and to the detriment of the plaintiff's act
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
