NAIMATULLAH KHAN versus THE STATE THROUGH ANTI-NARCOTICS FORCE, SINDH, KARACHI
Section 540 Control of the Narcotic Substances Steel Act (XXV of 1997), Sections 6 and 9 Object Section 540, CCP had a narcotic application for retrieval and re-examination of witnesses that had previously been examined and cross-examined. There was a request to call the investigating officer back and retake the exam. Already inspected, excluded by the trial court, sufficient jurisdiction was sought for any person to be summoned, re-summoned and examined, provided that such memorandum and re-examination of the matter was made. Was necessary for a fair decision. Should not be used routinely or mechanically or as a problem, before exercising such power, the court had to apply its mind to re-examining such witnesses in this case. Was necessary for a fair decision. The applicant chose not to raise any objection to the Investigation Officer's examination, which was also the complainant, and in the case in which the prosecutor presented his evidence in apprehending the officers, more on such a case after the inspection officer's inspection. There was no need to object, unless any evidence or piece of material appeared on the record that had to be confronted by the investigating officer. In the present case for the purpose of fact-finding, the only witness other than the investigating officer was in the witness box and was not examined by the applicant and it was not the case of the applicant that the witness under cross-examination Was prepared for any obscure material that the Investigation Officer objects to from section 4040 to
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
