Section 12 Civil Code of Conduct (v. 1908), Sections 151 and AXLI, R19 Procedure for Prosecutor Non-Prosecution The date of the hearing has not been claimed for the specific performance, compulsory and permanent injunction for the affected plaintiff which I have been claimed to have disputed property. The defendant / buyer purchased the disputed property from the seller and the seller had told the plaintiff that he was the buyer's lawyer and then agreed to sell the disputed property in the plaintiff's case. Rejected and dismissed for an illegal prosecution application under OXLE, R-19, read with section 151, was filed by CPC for re-entry / reinstatement of the said appeal. Was also excluded for illegal prosecution, restoration of the application under the XLI, R-19, CPC Another application was filed on the basis that the matter was settled on 3 2 2007 for the service of the applicants under O 2 XLI, R 19, CPC and therefore it cannot be excluded for instability. ? The defendant's lawyer could justify the presence of the court on 2 2 2007 when both lawyers were present and then adjourned the matter for hearing. If both lawyers were present, there was no way to prevent the court from hearing with both parties. It didn't matter. His consent and the circumstances thereafter to decide the matter did not guarantee the disappearance of the order of the appellate court which led to the appellate court dismissing the order by the appellate court and the appellate case. The court remanded that first
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
