Sections 8, 42 and 54 Concealment of Sale Verification Hiding Facts Plaintiff sued on the basis that defendant had received a substantial share of the sale consideration but refused to register a sales deadline. And the appeal filed by the plaintiff was simultaneously dismissed by the trial court. And the validity of the lower appellate court had no reference to the first trial in the entire trial of the trial court; its order of return of the plaintiff and the plaintiff had already admitted to the plaintiff that it had received Rs. 24,00,000. And such a case was not attended by the trial court or even the lower appellate court. The defendant's evidence had a special admission that he had filed the case before and the case was withdrawn and dismissed, before that, what was the application in that first case and that The reason why the case was withdrawn earlier was all the factors that the lower courts should consider like the two courts. As was not considered below, the High Court set aside the decisions and orders of both the courts and the case was remanded to the trial court. A second appeal was allowed after the decision
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
