Find a Lawyer

GUL MUHAMMAD versus STATE

Attempts to commit Section 497 Criminal Procedure (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 148 and 149 Qital Ahmed bail were earlier directed to the trial court to record the evidence of the prosecution's material witnesses within three months. I didn't make any progress. In the case, however, it was stated that the medical report directive of the High Court accused is on the record, in which the members of the Special Medical Board agreed that the accused was a hepatitis B carrier case in which the accused was killed. Had no intention The victim was not able to repeat the fire and only one bullet was attributed to him. It was alleged that the Hepatitis B carrier case was locked up in prison since 2007, which could be a threat to other prison inmates. Serve the accused in custody in specific circumstances of the case; the accused was admitted on bail under the circumstances.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• TAJUDDIN v. FEROZUDDIN AHMED 2010 YLR 256
• MUHAMMAD NAVEED ASLAM v. Mst. AISHA SIDDIQUI 2010 PLD 261
• ASIF HUSSAIN BHUTTO v. WATER AND POWER DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, through Chairman 2010 PLC(CS) 261
• SOBE KHAN v. STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION NEW PIND, SUKKUR 2010 YLR 264
• Mst. NARGIS BANO v. Mst. SHAMIM BANO 2010 MLD 266
• ARZ MUHAMMAD v. State 2010 PCrLJ 272
• Khawaja ZAIUL ISLAM v. ALAUDDIN MALIK 2010 CLC 273
• MUHAMMAD KHALID v. SHAFIQ TEXTILE MILLS LIMITED, KARACHI through Directors 2010 YLR 274

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

top advocate from Madinah lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes