SYED HAIDER IMAM RIZVI versus IVTH SINDH LABOUR COURT, KARACHI
Section 41 Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance (VII of 1968), Section 2 (b) and Section O12 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitution Petition Service Complaint applicant's job is terminated , He first sent notice of the complaint and subsequently the complaint was filed, which the Labor Court rejected on the basis that the respondent / employer is a club that provides services to its members of the Civil Aviation Authority. , This was no industry. And the Industrial Relations Ordinance / Act and the Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, did not apply to the Respondents' Club, which has the provisions of Section 2 (b) of the Industrial and Commercial Employment (Standing Orders) Ordinance, 1968. `The meaning of the Commercial Establishment defined was defined by, among other things, the Club a Club; in any case, whatever the Club may be, it may or may not be an industry under the Industrial Relations Ordinance 1969, 2002 and the Act, 2008. , But since the Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968 said that the trade establishment would work together. That means a club, even Club Industrial, was included in the definition of the Industrial and Commercial Employment Ordinance, 1968, applicable to the respondents / employer, applicant / employee's job in requesting the removal of the letter. No reason for termination was given, it just said that your job was terminated as needed services The statement that the services were no longer needed was an industrial and commercial employment (established orders). The Ordinance, Order 12 (3) of 1968, was not a statement that met the requirements. Order
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
