Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD USMAN versus STATE

The termination of proceedings of Sections 616161A, & 87 and Qu proceedings in this case, the accused of similar and similar role were acquitted while applying for jurisdiction under Section 265K, CR PC Application, circumstances. I was allowed in and the action was stopped

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• UNITED WORKERS UNION AL-ABBAS SUGAR MILLS LTD. (C.B.A.) through General Secretary v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH 2010 PLC 8
• BAKHAT MAL v. GHULAM HYDER 2010 YLR 9
• NIB BANK LIMITED v. State 2010 CLD 10
• Mst. MUSSARAT v. MUHAMMAD NAEEM 2010 PLD 10
• Moulvi SHAHZADO DREHO v. DISTRICT NAZIM, SUKKUR 2010 MLD 14
• ABDULLAH v. MUHAMMAD HAROON 2010 CLC 14
• Haji ABDUL KARIM v. FLORIDA BUILDERS (PVT.) LTD. 2010 PLD 17
• Syed HAIDER IMAM RIZVI v. IVTH SINDH LABOUR COURT, KARACHI 2010 PLC 20

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

ask a advocate free from Takhtbai lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes