Sections 514, 435 and 561A Penal Code (XLV of 1860), Sections 337A (ii), 148 and 149 Applicants for the guarantee of bail were set on the bail of seven accused, and then the seven accused jumped on bail and Absent from the case. The court and consequently their bail bonds were seized and notice was issued to the applicant / bail. The applicant presented six of the seven accused, while they were presenting the seventh accused before the trial court. Failing, the trial court imposed a fine of Rs. On appeal / bail, the appellate court reduced the amount from Rs 350,000 to Rs 110,000. The bail was guaranteed that the court was rigorous and requested a soft view that the court had already reduced the bail amount from Rs 350,000 to Rs 110,000, which meant that the petition For each of the six accused presented by the petitioner / bail, a fine of Rs 10,000 and the full amount of bail of Rs 50,000 which was the accused was not presented to the applicant by the applicant before the trial court. Counsel's lawyer argues that the impugned fine order was high, the impeachment order approved by the trial court did not demand any interference, dismissing the review request. Canceled, however, looking at the financial position of the applicant and looking softly, the applicant was allowed to pay a guaranteed amount of Rs 110,000 in four monthly equal installments.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
