Find a Lawyer

NASIRUDDIN GHORI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY

Article 199 (5) The constitutional jurisdiction of the High Court is the right of employees to control the corporation, which has no legal service rules with the government, and to the privatized organizations that have a constitutional petition against their employer corporation. File. The controlling shares of which the Government had the shares were enforceable under the jurisdiction of the High Court under Article 199 of the Constitution. However, if the corporation does not have the rules of service, the corporation's employees' constitutional request was liable to be rejected. There were also no privatization organizations - persons are enforceable under Article 199 of the Constitution and they do not have legal service rules; the employees of such organizations were obliged to reject the constitutional requests. \ R \ n \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• Mst. NASREEN v. MUHAMMAD ARIF 2010 YLR 318
• GUL HASSAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 321
• AKHTAR HUSSAIN v. State 2010 YLR 322
• PAKISTAN HANDICRAFTS, SINDH SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH v. PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD. 2010 CLC 323
• MUMTAZ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY through Managing Partner v. MFC (PVT.) LTD. 2010 MLD 327
• GMS LINES CO. LTD. through Applicant No.2 another v. ADAMJEE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED 2010 CLD 327
• INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ADVISORS ASSOCIATION through General Secretary v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Labour and Manpower, Islamabad 2010 PLD 328
• SULEMAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 329

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

jobs for advocates from Timergara lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes