Find a Lawyer

INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ADVISORS ASSOCIATION THROUGH GENERAL SECRETARY versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LABOUR AND MANPOWER, ISLAMABAD

Article 270A (6) [As the Constitution (X of the Eighteenth Amendment) Act (X of 2010) does not have the purpose and purpose of Article 270AA (6) of the Constitution Article 19A (6) of the Constitution. 4 2010 (the date of enactment of the alternative Article 270 AA (6) of the Constitution) All the laws made by Parliament in respect of the items listed in the whole legislative list would have been abolished, such was the malicious act of redress An attempt was made. By virtue of Article 270AA (6) of the Constitution, the end of Article 270AA (6) of the Constitution leaves the words of the Legislature in spite of the words. An unstated clause was used to indicate that the word `` in spite of it '' or not yet \ "or in spite of anything contrary to it in any clause." Delivery will prevail and this process goes on so that there is no longer anything left. Anything in the relevant current supply that conflicts with the word `nevertheless \ \ r \ n

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• PAKISTAN HANDICRAFTS, SINDH SMALL INDUSTRIES CORPORATION, GOVERNMENT OF SINDH v. PAKISTAN INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION (PVT.) LTD. 2010 CLC 323
• NASIRUDDIN GHORI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary 2010 PLC 323
• MUMTAZ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY through Managing Partner v. MFC (PVT.) LTD. 2010 MLD 327
• GMS LINES CO. LTD. through Applicant No.2 another v. ADAMJEE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED 2010 CLD 327
• SULEMAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 329
• KHAN MUHAMMAD v. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER/DISTRICT OFFICER (REV.) NAUSHAHRO FEROZE 2010 YLR 330
• IMAMUDDIN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 331
• SIRAJ UDDIN QURESHI v. State 2010 YLR 333

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

immigration advocates contact from Jehanian lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes