Section 2 (2 (b) / 34 34) Definition of Evidence The complainant, in his inspection, made a dishonest and futile attempt to improve the evidence that, when he arrived at the scene of the incident, he charged two persons. He was seen running away with rifles, though he was not mentioned anywhere in the FIR. All other witnesses in the prosecution have stated in their statements that when they arrived at the scene of the incident, they were fleeing from a complaint to the perpetrator. Had not been seen and all the other prosecution witnesses had arrived at the scene of the incident. There was no eyewitness to the incident and none of them was so witness It was open and many private persons were available at the time of the incident, but no independent person was taken from the public to be a witness and / or even as a counselor and other competent persons during the trial. Significant contradictions and corrections also emerged, which the complainant further stated that he had prepared the inquiry - the report from his own hand - and that he had filed an FIR after the preparation of the investigative report immediately. Had died, he could not be in a position to give the prosecutor's deceased statement that he had been found dead in his injuries. He disclosed his name to the parents and then the names of the suspects were disclosed in detail by the parents, addresses, allegedly assigned by them and the purpose of the same, It was intolerable that created suspicion in the prosecution's case, in which case, the trial court failed to prove the allegations against any suspicion.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
