Find a Lawyer

SULEMAN versus STATE

Section 497 and 561 in a trial in exchange for an application for a bail against the property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), section 17 (3) amendment code (XLV of 1860), section 324 application for bail and harassment. Termination of FIRIR was filed by the complainant with a delay of about 10 days without any explanation. For such delay the accused's name was not listed in the FIR, but the complaint A further statement of the arrestee was recorded about 12 days after the incident date identification parade was not held. The trial court is currently vacant. And the accused was behind bars since his arrest, when he had no further need for the purpose of interrogation. No one could be detained indefinitely for this crime, which would not have led to the trial. Was. Complainant and one of the witnesses backed Under Section 616161A, CRPC, the petitioner and the accused have been ordered to be released

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• NASIRUDDIN GHORI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary 2010 PLC 323
• MUMTAZ CONSTRUCTION COMPANY through Managing Partner v. MFC (PVT.) LTD. 2010 MLD 327
• GMS LINES CO. LTD. through Applicant No.2 another v. ADAMJEE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED 2010 CLD 327
• INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ADVISORS ASSOCIATION through General Secretary v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Labour and Manpower, Islamabad 2010 PLD 328
• KHAN MUHAMMAD v. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER/DISTRICT OFFICER (REV.) NAUSHAHRO FEROZE 2010 YLR 330
• IMAMUDDIN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 331
• SIRAJ UDDIN QURESHI v. State 2010 YLR 333
• RASHID v. State 2010 PCrLJ 337

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

online advocate from Hunza Nagar lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes