Section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302 (b) of the first bail, denying the first information report, stated that in the case of the role described in the FLR, seventeen persons were referred to the complainant and his sons. Accused of accepting rights from. Individuals can be categorized into two groups: the first three people whose bail was granted and the suspect fired, resulting in the shooting. Secondly, the other thirteen persons who opened fire on the complainant and his other son, but the complainant and the complainant's second son were injured, is in the first group of four persons, including the accused. , Was different from the other group of thirteen. The groups were not in harmony with each other, the special role was attributed to the three co-accused who were granted bail, including the trial court granting bail to the three co-accused, which appeared to be false. And that didn't help. In the FIR, the case of the accused on the principle of consistency of the nominee and the person who was declared to have the exact role armed with deadly weapons and injuring the deceased will not be entitled to guarantee Prima facie support. , There was plenty of content. Under Section 302 available to link the accused to the crime, in the circumstances, the accused's PPC bail plea was dismissed.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
