ABDUL REHMAN versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY MINISTRY OF PETROLEUM, ISLAMABAD
Unilateral changes in the benefits of retiring by a retired employee of the Arts 9 and 199 Constitution Petition Gas Company, including medical services available at the time of retirement from the applicant, including a constitutional petition filed against the company were not enforceable because they were a private organization. Is and is not Legislative Laws Governing Government Holds Company's Controlling Shares Company's Memorandum of Association was signed by seven persons belonging to an organization of Pak Army. The controlling shares were still maintained by the Government of Pakistan. Such a company was a considerate person in the constitutional application of Article 199 of the Constitution did not include questions related to the Master and the Servant because the applicant had the opportunity to retire before retiring from employment and other privileges. But their losses could not be overcome and if e If so, then they will likely work and apply only to employees who have retired after such a change, especially as a senior citizen who claims to be entitled to medical assistance. Such a company is 73 years under the purview of Article 199 of the Constitution. Such legal liability cannot be allowed to be infringed. The High Court directed the company to allow the applicant the same benefits that he could apply in his case on the occasion of retirement. No change shall be brought to the loss of the applicant or any other person upon his retirement.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
