Find a Lawyer

RAJA WEAVING MILLS LIMITED, KARACHI versus COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, KARACHI

The raising of the revenue by Section 25 (c) and 133 Assessment Officer without raising any question to the appellant's contentious appellate authority for illegal reasons may be dismissed by the Tribunal for the fact that the nature of the nature of the nature of the case. Can't be the legal basis for the first time. Before the Tribunal's accuracy record showed that Assisi had been contested by various notices before discrimination enhancement and the finalization of the diagnostic order, but he failed to provide any explanation. Was, therefore, the fact finding by the Tribunal would not require any interference with the High Court reference request. Dismiss in the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• Syed AHSAN ALI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Information Technology 2010 PLC(CS) 668
• Mst. NOOR JEHAN v. CITY DISTRICT GOVERNMENT, KARACHI through District Coordination Officer 2010 CLC 669
• SALMAN IRTIZA v. AHMED MIAN 2010 PCrLJ 672
• MUHAMMAD FAYAZ v. State 2010 YLR 673
• JATCO KABUSHIKI KAISHA v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE MARKS 2010 CLD 676
• WASIM AHMED v. State 2010 YLR 678
• GHULAM SARWAR v. State 2010 MLD 680
• SALMAN QURESHI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 682

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

inheritance advocates near Head Marala lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes