NAZAR MUHAMMAD versus NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU
Section 498 National Accountability Ordinance (XVIII of 1999), Sections 9, 10 and 18 arrest before corruption and corruption proceedings, the allegation against the accused was that he was unacquainted with his legitimate sources during his tenure. And accumulated real estate. The sources of income disclosed by the Investigators proved to be sufficient to buy the same property or the same property in the next year. However, this requires deep proof of evidence and evidence, which cannot be done at the bail-out stage because the parties can face the same bias, at the bail-out stage, making only a temporary assessment of the material available. Which showed the evaluation of the material available in the circumstances that the defendant was entitled to the privilege of guarantee of the interim guarantee already approved by the bail.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
