Find a Lawyer

MST. RUKHSANA versus STATE

The section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), an attempt to compel Section 324/34 probation staff, was an elderly woman with a history of cardiac arrest cardiovascular disease, who was undergoing treatment at the Institute of Cardiovascular Diseases. Given the nature of the crime and its effects and the age of the accused in the last six years, he was entitled to the benefits available under the law, the accused was admitted in bail,

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• SOOMAR v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1604
• ABDUL HAKEEM v. State 2010 MLD 1608
• Miss FAREEDA v. State 2010 YLR 1610
• SHAHID KHAN NIZAMANI v. RETURNING OFFICER 2010 CLC 1615
• SHAMS MOHIUDDIN ANSARI v. INTERNATIONAL BUILDERS through Partners 2010 CLC 1622
• NAZAR MUHAMMAD v. NATIONAL ACCOUNTABILITY BUREAU 2010 MLD 1623
• Syed SAYEED HAMID v. DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE 2010 YLR 1629
• ABDUL RAHEEM v. State 2010 MLD 1631

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

inheritance advocates near Moro lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes