Find a Lawyer

AHMED versus STATE

The Section 497 Prevention Code (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 murder case, denied the incident on the big day while the FIR was lodged the same day in which the facts and motions of the incident were disclosed. I came across the names of the accused and all the witnesses involved the specific role of the post-mortem done by the doctor, confirmed the version of the witnesses, the fingerprints of the accused were also on both sides of the deceased doctor's neck. Were found, he announced in his opinion. The affected person died of trembling due to panic. The accused failed to file a further inquiry and since the accused had committed the murder of a 5/6 year old boy who sentenced the death sentence, the accused's request for bail was dropped,

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• Shaikh YOUSUF SHAHID v. SHAHID NADEEM 2010 CLD 1798
• ABDUL SATTAR v. IIND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE/EX-OFFCIO JUSTICE OF PEACE 2010 PCrLJ 1801
• A.R. KHAN & SONS (PVT.) LTD through Authorized Officer v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, Islamabad 2010 CLC 1810
• JAWWAD KHAN alias JAVED v. State 2010 YLR 1810
• TOYS INTERNATIONAL (PVT.) LTD. v. HAIDER ALI MULJI 2010 YLR 1814
• MUHAMMAD SADIQ v. THE STATE through Prosecutor General Sindh 2010 YLR 1817
• ABDUL SHAKOOR v. State 2010 MLD 1818
• HABIB BANK LTD. through Attorneys v. SCHON TEXTILE LTD. through Director 2010 CLD 1819

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

property advocate from Chiniot lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes