Find a Lawyer

Every Lawyer listed in this directory is verified by SJP verification Team

✓ Free WhatsApp lawyer help
Need to speak to a lawyer now?

Chat with us free on WhatsApp — tell us your city and legal matter and our team connects you with the right lawyer. No form, no fee.

💬 Instant WhatsApp chat ⚖ Verified lawyer directory ⏰ Replies in minutes

ABDUL SHAKOOR versus STATE


Sections 497 (2) Crimes against Property (Enforcement Hood) Ordinance (VI of 1979), Sections 17 (3) Sanctions (XLV of 1860), Sections 324, 353, 397, 148 and 149 West Pakistan Arms Ordinance (XX of 1965) ), Section 4 (d) attempt to commit bail and Haraba and further investigation, the grant of further investigation did not name the accused in the FIR with any specific role, no effect of recovery of any crime weapon from the accused. Eyewitnesses did not identify the accused. The identification parade, nor did the prosecutor call them to identify the accused, was put on the identity parade 10 days after the arrest of the accused. The only person to identify the accused was Section HA, who brought the accused to the Judicial Magistrate for his identity parade. He was not reliable and said that the evidence of Section HA was not credible. More on the affected case. Investigation came out, the accused was admitted on bail, under conditions

Find a Lawyer Near You

Dealing with a matter like this? Connect with a verified advocate in your city — free on SJP Lawyers Directory.

🔍 Find a Lawyer
Popular cities: Lahore· Karachi· Islamabad· Rawalpindi· Multan· Faisalabad
immigration advocate from Lalshanra lawyer

SJP Lawyers DirectorySJP Lawyers Directory

Pakistan's leading legal-technology platform and verified lawyer directory — connecting clients, lawyers, law firms and Bar Associations across the country.

Get in Touch

© 2018–2027 SJP Legnocrats (SMC-Private) Limited. All rights reserved.
Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes
👋 Need a lawyer? Chat with us free on WhatsApp now.