A.R. KHAN & SONS (PVT.) LTD THROUGH AUTHORIZED OFFICER versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF COMMERCE, ISLAMABAD
Sections 2 (j), 13 (2) (j) and 21 Public Procurement Regulatory Authority Ordinances (XXII of 2002), Section 5 Public Procurement Rules, 2004, Rr 3, 4, 20, and 42 (c) Competitive Commission Ordinance ( XVI of 2010), Sections (1) (e) (k), 3 and 4 of the Gwadar Port between the Port of Singapore Authority for the import of cargo by the Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Arts 18 and 1991 Constitutional Application Trading Corporation of Pakistan. Convert to concession agreement and Gwadar Port Authority opened a commercial corporation to develop and develop various ports facilities in Gwadar port concession area on the basis of BOT (Built, Operate and Transfer). Storming services and import handling facilities of the Port of Singapore Authority without bid Except for a constitutional application trading corporation challenging such an Act to participate in the provision of such services in the Trading Corporation of Gwadar Port Playa. The Port of Singapore Authority only provided such services in Gwadar, thus, there was no option but to enter into a direct contract with the Port of Singapore Authority under R42 of the Trading Corporation Public Procurement Rules, 2004. Did not extend to the port, but rather to a certain part of it Vidarbha, which had the exclusive right to invest in the Port of Singapore Authority, while the Gwadar Port Authority had complete freedom to develop the remainder of the existing Gwadar Port facilities which are currently operating in the concessional area under the agreement. , The Port of Singapore Authority could not specifically make such an agreement under this Agreement. Trading Corporation of Gwadar needs to be imported, but if imported
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
