Sections 497 (2) of the Conduct Rule (XVL of 1860), Sections 302, 337H (ii), 114, 148 and 149 Qatil Ahmed bail, there was enmity between the complainant and the accused party for further investigation, mostly of the same family. All the complainants were involved by the complainant. No indirect act of hurting the victim was attributed to the co-accused / accused, who was alleged to have shown the only act of provocation to the place where the accused participant was located, but he was well off. Was equipped, but it was not mentioned anywhere in the FIR that it did not cause any injury to any of the victims, the victim, the complainant or the prosecution witnesses, nor was it allegedly good. Has been charged and the accused has been charged with liability or after the recording of the evidence, Was given. In these circumstances, the further investigation was successful, the co-accused was granted bail.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
