SALMAN ANSARI versus FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN THROUGH SECRETARY, MINISTRY OF LAW, ISLAMABAD
The notification of appointment of judges in the constitutional petition of Arts 197 and 1993, the legal status of the applicant was first appointed as Additional Judge of the High Court on 15-9 2007 and continued till 3 11 2007 and again as Additional Judge of the High Court. He was notified to become an additional position while the applicant was appointed as a Permanent High Court Judge by notification dated 15.09.2008 with a six month extension to the High Court Judge, The date was given on 17 3 2009 but on the basis of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court, he withdrew as a High Court Judge. The report was dated 15th 2008, 2008 with no legal authority and, therefore, had no legal effect and was the date of the notification notification, which was also without legal jurisdiction on 3, 2009 3 2009, so it was natural, logical. And obviously that decision had a clear impact on the Supreme Court's decision. The court, therefore, contends that the notification dated 2 8 2009 was without legal authority and had no legal effect whatsoever. The notification, therefore, was merely an administrative household task which was bound to be performed in accordance with the terms of the judgment passed by the Supreme Court. The petitioner was never a permanent judge of the High Court; he was appointed as an Additional Judge, according to which the notification was sworn in on 15th December 2007. 9, 2007 and his term as Additional Judge ended on 169 2008, and after that date the petitioner has never been a Judge or Additional Judge of the High Court Petition has been dismissed under the circumstances.
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
