Find a Lawyer

SYED CHAN PEER SHAH versus MUHAMMAD SHAFI

Article 13 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 The effect of the landlord reviewing the tenant's default eviction sale in payment of tenancy, the landlord filed a tenant removal request on the basis of a change in premises and payment of rent. The relationship with the landlord as the default tenant was further emphasized that there was a contract of sale between the landlord and the tenant under which he had taken care of the sale of the landlord and the tenancy agreement. Was denied, the Bogus Rental Controller allowed payment to be excluded on the basis of default Y The rental appellate court upheld the decision on the appellant's rent controller. The tenant stated that the landlord belonged to the landlord and it was sold to the tenant. Landlord and tenant relationship existed The High Court in its constitutional jurisdiction refused to interfere with the conclusions of the following courts.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• FAZAL HUSSAIN SHAH v. RUSTAM 2010 YLR 297
• SAEED KHAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 298
• SALMAN ANSARI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law, Islamabad 2010 PLD 300
• SAFDAR ALI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 301
• MUHAMMAD ASGHAR v. PAKISTAN DEFENCE OFFICERS HOUSING AUTHORITY through Administrator 2010 PLC(CS) 303
• Mst. ZAINAB KHATOON v. DISTRICT POLICE OFFICER QAMBAR/SHAHDAD KOT 2010 YLR 304
• MUTUAL FUNDS ASSOCIATION OF PAKISTAN (MUFAP) v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Finance, Government of Pakistan 2010 PLC 306
• ZAINUL ABDIN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 307

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

famous high court advocate from Fateh Pur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes