Find a Lawyer

MUHAMMAD RAFIQUE versus DR. QADIR ALI KHAN

Section 12 The specific performance of the contract restitution agreement was filed by the plaintiff before the expiry of the due time as the defendant refused to sell the suit property and sought to cancel the sale agreement without a valid contract notice. Where the buyer himself had refused to complete the transaction, the notice to terminate the contract was sent to the plaintiff for approval without issue four days after the expiry of the contract, nor the case. Was filed prematurely, nor was the plaintiff failing to complete the contract. The sale transaction, on the contrary, was the defendant who thought second to family pressure before the expiry of the contract and refused to pay his obligations. The High Court directed the plaintiff to name the plaintiff. Transfer suit property The verdict was given in the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• Mst. MIR BAHAR v. SAUDABAD COLONY TRUST through Deputy Commissioner 2010 CLC 292
• DREAMWORLD FAMILY RESORT through Secretary v. REGISTRAR OF TRADE UNIONS 2010 PLC 293
• MUHAMMAD HUSSAIN v. ABDUL WAHID 2010 YLR 293
• AKBAR v. State 2010 MLD 293
• FAZAL HUSSAIN SHAH v. RUSTAM 2010 YLR 297
• SAEED KHAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 298
• SALMAN ANSARI v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Law, Islamabad 2010 PLD 300
• SAFDAR ALI v. State 2010 PCrLJ 301

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

power of attorney advocate Kamber Ali Khan lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes