Section 28 Contract Act (IX of 1872), section 25 void contract The sale of a decision on the suit of conversion for the specific performance of the contract to sell the immovable contract was settled in favor of the plaintiff but the lower appellate court appealed Allowed and excluded the matter. The land sale was completely lacking and it was not established by the evidence available on the record to show that the parties were close relatives, who moved the property out of love and affection, thus This type of sale agreement was a banned contract. Because of section 28 of the Special Relief Act 1877 that cannot be specifically enforced, the court may deny the specific performance of the contract on the ground that the insufficient suit filed by the plaintiff is considered in section 25 of the Contract Act 1872. And was completely withheld under Section 28 of the Special Relief. The lower appellate court of the Act, 1877, correctly overturned the decision and passed the specific decision by the trial court. The performance of the contract was not flawed in the judgment and the order passed by the lower appellate court. I was excluded
Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010
