Find a Lawyer

HIKMAT KHAN versus STATE

Section 497 (2) Prohibited (Enforcement) Order (4 of 1979), Guaranteed possession of Arts 3/4 intoxicants, further investigation granting that a small amount of heroin was recovered, the matter will need further investigation. Whether the intoxicant was for personal consumption of the accused or for sale, otherwise it remains to be seen whether the accused's case falls under the prohibited clause of section 497 (1), the CC released on bail. Had gone, under the circumstances

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• MUHAMMAD MUQEEM v. ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE KOTRI 2010 PCrLJ 1784
• MUHAMMAD ASHRAF v. Mrs. AZRA MUQEEM 2010 CLC 1788
• BANK OF KHYBER v. NAZAMUDDIN 2010 CLD 1792
• MACKS ELECTRONICS INTERNATIONAL CO. through Attorney v. NATIONAL BANK OF PAKISTAN 2010 CLD 1795
• FAIZ MUHAMMAD v. State 2010 MLD 1797
• Shaikh YOUSUF SHAHID v. SHAHID NADEEM 2010 CLD 1798
• ABDUL SATTAR v. IIND ADDITIONAL SESSIONS JUDGE/EX-OFFCIO JUSTICE OF PEACE 2010 PCrLJ 1801
• A.R. KHAN & SONS (PVT.) LTD through Authorized Officer v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Commerce, Islamabad 2010 CLC 1810

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

law firms from Daulat Pur lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes