Find a Lawyer

IMAMUDDIN versus STATE

Section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302/34 Murder M Guarantee, the presence of any witness was not confessed against the motive of the crime which was allegedly committed by the complainant before the extra judicial confession. Was charged during the raid. Investigation and he was on interim pre-arrest bail and was also involved in the case. The state's lawyer freely granted bail to the accused's bail, he was granted bail, under the circumstances.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• GMS LINES CO. LTD. through Applicant No.2 another v. ADAMJEE INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED 2010 CLD 327
• INDUSTRIAL RELATIONS ADVISORS ASSOCIATION through General Secretary v. FEDERATION OF PAKISTAN through Secretary, Ministry of Labour and Manpower, Islamabad 2010 PLD 328
• SULEMAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 329
• KHAN MUHAMMAD v. LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER/DISTRICT OFFICER (REV.) NAUSHAHRO FEROZE 2010 YLR 330
• SIRAJ UDDIN QURESHI v. State 2010 YLR 333
• RASHID v. State 2010 PCrLJ 337
• SHAMAUDDIN v. IVTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (EAST) KARACHI 2010 CLC 337
• SONERI BANK LIMITED v. ABDUL QADIR JANGDA 2010 CLD 337

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

us immigration advocates from Swat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes