Find a Lawyer

SONERI BANK LIMITED versus ABDUL QADIR JANGDA

The execution of Section 19 of the Record of Appeals shows that from April 2009, the execution petition was working on the service of the judgment debtor under section 19 (1) of the Financial Institutions (Recovery of Finance) Ordinance 2001, which was executed. The benefit of the order was given to the executor and the decision-maker was not required to use the notice procedure, and at the same time, the execution proceedings should be taken forward. Directive ordered the sale of mortgaged properties. Holder within a specified period

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• IMAMUDDIN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 331
• SIRAJ UDDIN QURESHI v. State 2010 YLR 333
• RASHID v. State 2010 PCrLJ 337
• SHAMAUDDIN v. IVTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (EAST) KARACHI 2010 CLC 337
• SHAHZADA v. MUHAMMAD USMAN 2010 YLR 338
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, MODEL CUSTOMS COLLECTORATE OF APPRAISEMENT, KARACHI v. CHINA NATIONAL WATER RESOURCES AND HYDROPOWER ENGINEERING, KARACHI 2010 PTD 343
• KASHIF ABRO v. State 2010 PCrLJ 344
• SABIR AHMED v. NAZEER AHMED 2010 CLD 344

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

top civil advocates from Cherat lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes