Find a Lawyer

KASHIF ABRO versus STATE

Article 222 and evidence 2 ????? Definition of evidence Nobody involved the accused in the matter until the counsel for recovery was involved in their evidence was the evidence of the complainant and the person on the telephone. The complainant was informed about the complaint by which it was not examined. The prosecution confirmed the version of the Complainant Investigation Officer, before which the accused confessed to his crime; he did not present it before a magistrate to record his statement under section 164 under. In the circumstances of the PC statement given by the accused before the hearing

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• SHAMAUDDIN v. IVTH ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE (EAST) KARACHI 2010 CLC 337
• SONERI BANK LIMITED v. ABDUL QADIR JANGDA 2010 CLD 337
• SHAHZADA v. MUHAMMAD USMAN 2010 YLR 338
• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, MODEL CUSTOMS COLLECTORATE OF APPRAISEMENT, KARACHI v. CHINA NATIONAL WATER RESOURCES AND HYDROPOWER ENGINEERING, KARACHI 2010 PTD 343
• SABIR AHMED v. NAZEER AHMED 2010 CLD 344
• SAMAD BALOCH v. State 2010 MLD 344
• ALLAHDINO v. GHULAM MUSTAFA 2010 YLR 346
• MUBASHIR HUSSAIN SHAH v. 1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARACHI EAST 2010 CLC 346

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

law firms from Akhora Khattak lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes