Find a Lawyer

ALLAHDINO versus GHULAM MUSTAFA

Article 39 (6) and 52 Constitution of Pakistan (1973), Article 199 Constitutional application for counting of votes The petitioner declared the order passed by the Election Tribunal as concrete which allowed the respondent's request for counting of votes. Respondent challenged the selection of the applicant During the hearing of the Podia Election Request by way of the election petition, the respondents applied for the counting of votes, the Election Tribunal ordered the counting of votes , Which was challenged, the Election Tribunal did not approve the final order, ordered the Election Tribunal to recalculate The dog The order passed by the tribunal without recording the votes without proof was inherently invalid which could not be said in the constitutional petition that the application was being misconstrued, dismissed.

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• COLLECTOR OF CUSTOMS, MODEL CUSTOMS COLLECTORATE OF APPRAISEMENT, KARACHI v. CHINA NATIONAL WATER RESOURCES AND HYDROPOWER ENGINEERING, KARACHI 2010 PTD 343
• KASHIF ABRO v. State 2010 PCrLJ 344
• SABIR AHMED v. NAZEER AHMED 2010 CLD 344
• SAMAD BALOCH v. State 2010 MLD 344
• MUBASHIR HUSSAIN SHAH v. 1ST ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, KARACHI EAST 2010 CLC 346
• MUHAMMAD TAHIR MAJEED v. SECURITY LEASING CORPORATION LTD. 2010 CLD 351
• MUHAMMAD GHUFRAN v. State 2010 PCrLJ 351
• AMMANULLAH SOOMRO v. PAKISTAN INTERNATIONAL AIR LINES CORPORATION through Managing Director/Chairman 2010 YLR 352

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

female advocates from Chowk Maitla lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes