Find a Lawyer

ABDUL HAKEEM versus STATE

Section 497 of the Conduct Rule (XLV of 1860), Section 302 (b) / 34 of Qutul Um Bell, in a planned manner, denied the charges with his comrades and, on the other hand, committed the murder of an unarmed and innocent person. The allegations were due to the whispers. The case responsible for the crime of the accused did not come under the purview of Section 497 (2);

Related judgments — Karachi High Court Sindh, 2010

• GUL AMIR v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1591
• GHULAM MUHAMMAD v. State 2010 MLD 1595
• MUHAMMAD SHABBIR v. Mrs. FARAHA BIBI 2010 CLC 1603
• SOOMAR v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1604
• Miss FAREEDA v. State 2010 YLR 1610
• SHAHID KHAN NIZAMANI v. RETURNING OFFICER 2010 CLC 1615
• Mst. RUKHSANA v. State 2010 PCrLJ 1617
• SHAMS MOHIUDDIN ANSARI v. INTERNATIONAL BUILDERS through Partners 2010 CLC 1622

All Karachi High Court Sindh judgments of 2010 →

law firms from Naudero lawyer

Talk to a Lawyer Free · replies in minutes